[tor-bugs] #22990 [Metrics/Library]: Add a heartbeat log message indicating progress and estimated time left
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Dec 4 08:44:42 UTC 2017
#22990: Add a heartbeat log message indicating progress and estimated time left
-----------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner: iwakeh
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_revision
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Library | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: metrics-2017 | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: iwakeh | Sponsor:
-----------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by karsten):
Replying to [comment:9 iwakeh]:
> I'd like to use a Logger different from the standard Logger. Maybe,
'statistics' as in Onionoo, i.e.,
`LoggerFactory.getLogger("statistics")...`? The progress information is
rather of statistical nature, the log statements will show up in the
general ('-all.log') anyway; and it would be possible to have the
information separated by simple logback configuration.
Okay.
> The percent calculation should only be done once: `100 * progress /
total`.
> Why not only keep track of the percentage done, i.e.,
previousPercentDone and percentDone or similar?
Sure, why not.
> More importantly, `readTarballs` needs to catch the IOE to avoid halting
the process just b/c of one tarball being faulty.
Ugh, very good point. That's an oversight.
> Information about skipped tarballs should also be logged to the
'statistics' logger
Not sure about that one. That's something different than what we're trying
to achieve here: have an easy way to learn about progress when importing
large amounts of data.
> and the tarball skipped should be logged as warning as before.
No, it's perfectly fine to leave a tarball in place and use the history
file to avoid reading it once again. If we want to log it, it should be on
debug.
> Maybe, think about other possible statistics, which could be easily
logged?
Nothing came to mind yesterday. The new message was already very useful
when importing one year of descriptors which took five hours. After three
or four hours one wonders whether it's still doing anything useful or if
it's going to take days or weeks, and then it's really useful to have this
message. I'd say let's save future statistics for when we find out that we
need them.
I can revise the patch today or tomorrow, unless you beat me to it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22990#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list