[tor-bugs] #19960 [Core Tor/Tor]: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Thu Dec 8 10:07:30 UTC 2016
#19960: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing
options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: yancm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.2.9.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.2.9.1-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: self test regression netbsd | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by yancm):
Replying to [comment:15 nickm]:
> b) Does netbsd support ipfw or not? We imply "yes" in test_options.c,
but "no" in our definition of KERNEL_MAY_SUPPORT_IPFW. Which of these is
correct?
I am pretty sure the answer is no. NetBSD has some support for pf (OpenBSD
origins), ipf (independent project? Darren Reed author - no longer under
development) and npf which is the new official mechanism in NetBSD as I
understand.
I've never used pf, I currently still use ipf only because too lazy to re-
visit my rule-sets and replace scripts, etc.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19960#comment:19>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list