[tor-bugs] #18749 [Tor]: Consider only including one fallback per operator
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Sun Apr 10 22:00:31 UTC 2016
#18749: Consider only including one fallback per operator
-------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.???
Component: Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points: small
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by s7r):
I like this, even if it's trivial to game we should at least not allow it
by default.
In #15775 I saw that Exit relays are also on the list. Has this changed?
I am having some mixed thoughts about including Exit relays in the list of
fallback directories. My thoughts are:
- Exit relays are more scarce (even the network might not have the exit
capacity overloaded, there are a lot of middle relays compared to exit
relays).
- Exit relays might need the extra traffic required for a fallback
directory to serve exit circuits.
- Exit relays have higher chances to be taken down (ISP gets mad because
of abuse/blacklisting, seizures, etc.) which means (possibly) small
performance penalties for the previous Tor releases that included them.
How will the list look like if we only consider middle relays with a
certain minimum weight such that we will be able to hardcode them without
any weight? I guess we still have plenty to choose from.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18749#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list