[tor-bugs] #13158 [Tor]: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Wed Sep 30 21:55:57 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [tor-bugs] #13158 [Tor]: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?
- Next message: [tor-bugs] [Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki] Batch modify: #4580, #5460, #8106, #9476, #13966, #6773, #6836, #7193, #7478, #8195, #8625, #10186, #10812, #11151, #12898, #12900, #12901, #13987, #14137, #14999, #15233, #15235, #16943
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
#13158: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?
---------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: Sebastian | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.???
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: doc easy lorax
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by arma):
Saying "plus sign ("+")" would have solved the original issue for the
ticket. I had exactly this issue in the past too, and have learned to
search for "plus", but that doesn't scale to the third confused person. :)
An easy early fractional fix at least.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13158#comment:8>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
- Previous message: [tor-bugs] #13158 [Tor]: Did we ever document +/ semantics for config files?
- Next message: [tor-bugs] [Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki] Batch modify: #4580, #5460, #8106, #9476, #13966, #6773, #6836, #7193, #7478, #8195, #8625, #10186, #10812, #11151, #12898, #12900, #12901, #13987, #14137, #14999, #15233, #15235, #16943
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list