[tor-bugs] #12201 [Tor]: Don't weight by bandwidth when selecting among bridges
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Wed Jan 14 00:39:14 UTC 2015
#12201: Don't weight by bandwidth when selecting among bridges
------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: asn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_information
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.???
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: tor-bridge tor-guard
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by isis):
* cc: isis (added)
* status: new => needs_information
Comment:
Could we potentially up the maximum of 100KB/s in
`bridge_get_advertised_bandwidth_bounded()` to the (now colloquially
recommended for relays) bandwidth rate of 250KB/s? As far as I can see,
"good" relays (those >=250KB/s) would still be considered "good", and it
would increase the scale for which bridges are considered sub-par… is this
correct?
Should I make a separate ticket for this suggestion, since this is
concerning not weighting by bandwidth at all?
-----
Also, FWIW, I think the current solution of marginally believing the self-
reported bandwidth of the bridge is the best we have… and there are now
plans to have official bridge BW measurements in the future (meaning that
we should obviously continue weighting by bandwidth, albeit with changes
to believe the reported bandwidths even more). Would it actually be okay
to close this ticket, and open a new ticket for the above suggestion to
increase bandwidth?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12201#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list