[tor-bugs] #13593 [Tor]: Is "Link 1 2" in the descriptors obsolete?
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Tue Oct 28 11:07:34 UTC 2014
#13593: Is "Link 1 2" in the descriptors obsolete?
--------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: unspecified
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
--------------------+----------------------------------
It looks like we're up to link protocol 4 in practice, but the descriptors
still write this static string:
{{{
"protocols Link 1 2 Circuit 1\n"
}}}
dir-spec.txt tells us
{{{
Both lists are space-separated sequences of numbers, to indicate
which
protocols the server supports. As of 30 Mar 2008, specified
protocols are "Link 1 2 Circuit 1". See section 4.1 of tor-
spec.txt
for more information about link protocol versions.
}}}
but Section 4.1 of tor-spec.txt indeed admits to link protocols 3 and 4.
It looks like nothing in routerparse.c or anywhere else looks at the
'protocols' line of the descriptor. Heck, normal clients don't even get
the descriptor anymore.
I assume the last Tor version to not understand link protocol 2 is way
obsolete (Tor 0.2.0.x era I think).
And if clients never see the descriptors, it's hard to imagine how we'll
be able to tell them a different Circuit protocol anyway.
Should we dump this line? Have we accidentally lost anything here?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13593>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list