[tor-bugs] #12023 [Tor]: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy cell?
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri May 16 14:02:14 UTC 2014
#12023: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy
cell?
------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: tor-client
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by cypherpunks):
So fix for #7912 introduces a "fun" property for client side of client-to-
relay connection, but actually no change anything. Relay will close
connection from client after last long-before-nothing-sent circuit was
destroyed for both cases with and without #7912.
While #6799 initially was about relay-to-relay connections. But if we want
to fix client-to-relay connections expire time-out then yes need to
rethink #6799.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12023#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list