[tor-bugs] #12442 [Tor]: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not extra-info desc
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Jun 23 15:11:10 UTC 2014
#12442: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not
extra-info desc
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: | Status: new
enhancement | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
Priority: normal | Version:
Component: Tor | Keywords: tor-bridge, maybe-proposal,
Resolution: | bridgedb-parsers
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by atagar):
> Including transport lines in both server and extra-info descriptors is
not necessary, IMO. Feel free to ask on tor-dev@ if anybody else uses
these lines.
I agree that it's not necessary to duplicate the line, but should be
proceeded by a tor-dev@ notice. The transport line is an optional value in
extra-info descriptors, so if it simply starts being omitted then the only
risk is that someone else (not me or Karsten) read it and start thinking
that transports don't exist any more.
Out of curiosity does this mean bridges will need to fetch server
descriptors rather than microdescriptors?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12442#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list