[tor-bugs] #12442 [Tor]: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not extra-info desc
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri Aug 15 08:04:03 UTC 2014
#12442: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not
extra-info desc
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: | Status: new
enhancement | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
Priority: normal | Version:
Component: Tor | Keywords: tor-bridge, maybe-proposal,
Resolution: | bridgedb-parsers 026-triaged-1 026-deferrable
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by isis):
Replying to [comment:4 karsten]:
> Replying to [comment:3 atagar]:
> > Out of curiosity does this mean bridges will need to fetch server
descriptors rather than microdescriptors?
>
> Bridges never fetched microdescriptors but always server descriptors.
The bridge authority does not even generate microdescriptors for bridges.
It's a relay-only thing.
Right. They ''do'' have networkstatus documents, however.
> Also noting down here that atagar and I agree that `@type bridge-server-
descriptor` in sanitized bridge server descriptors should be
[https://collector.torproject.org/formats.html#bridge-descriptors raised
from 1.0 to 1.1] once these descriptors include sanitized transport lines.
Agreed as well.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12442#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list