[tor-bugs] #2678 [BridgeDB]: bridgedb /16 filtering needs review
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Apr 21 20:12:51 UTC 2014
#2678: bridgedb /16 filtering needs review
-----------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: BridgeDB | Version:
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-----------------------------+--------------------
Changes (by isis):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:8 sysrqb]:
> hrm, ok. I know there's a comment in the bridge selection code that says
it does this, but it seems like it's misplaced. But I do think I remember
seeing a check for this somewhere else, though. I have a feeling, in any
case, we're going to want to come back to this as we get further into
#7520.
That comment is
[https://gitweb.torproject.org/bridgedb.git/blob/HEAD:/lib/bridgedb/Bridges.py#l1042
on this line], FWIW.
And yes, the comment is misplaced. The line directly underneath it just
takes all the bridges in the splitter. I'm not sure if implementing this
is still a good idea, given that we have volunteer bridge operators
running bridges very close to each other, esp. for PTs, and implementing
this would likely severely decrease the bridges available to a user.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2678#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list