[tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Mar 11 21:48:58 UTC 2013
#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component: Tor | Version: Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
Keywords: tor-auth | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nickm):
So, do we in fact have an idea of how to fix this? We could try to
grandfather in whichever nodes are currently in the consensus directory,
but as soon as nodes drop out once, we'll be out of luck. We could go
with whichever node has been around the longest -- the one with the
highest total_weighted_time or highest weighted_uptime in its rephist.
Any other thoughts?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list