[tor-bugs] #7550 [BridgeDB]: BridgeDB email responder is not interactive
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Sun Jun 30 17:10:26 UTC 2013
#7550: BridgeDB email responder is not interactive
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: aagbsn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_information
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: BridgeDB | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by sysrqb):
Replying to [comment:9 asn]:
> > Replying to [comment:7 sysrqb]:
> I'm still not sold that rate-limiting is necessary for BridgeDB to be
able to process mails. I would have thought that a _huge_ amount of mails
is needed to bloat a modern computer (especially without expensive crypto
happening during processing). But there was probably a reason that the
rate-limiting was introduced in the first place, so I guess it's fine.
>
I don't think it's something we absolutely need, but I can't think of a
reason why a person needs to send a query for the same bridges over and
over and over again. And, if they do, I don't see why we need to respond
to them. The most intense part of the response is the process of hashing
the email address and determining from where in the hash ring their
bridges should be selected.
> > So, thoughts? More interactive email responder is good/bad? (choose
one)
>
> Like, aagbsn, I also see #7520 as a long-term project (my guess is that
it won't be deployed in the next 6 months).
>
Agreed, but I think designing this should be a priority for BridgeDB.
> I'd say that the interactive email responder might be easy-ish to
implement, and it will greatly improve the experience of its users, so
it's probably worth pursuing IMO.
Sounds good.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7550#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list