[tor-bugs] #9166 [Tor]: Write a UTP-based channel implementation
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri Jun 28 16:54:39 UTC 2013
#9166: Write a UTP-based channel implementation
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: unspecified
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: tor-relay utp | Parent: #9165
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nickm):
Replying to [comment:1 hsn]:
> QUIC would be most likely better choice. Its backed by Google and it
will get well tuned.
>
> http://blog.chromium.org/2013/06/experimenting-with-quic.html
Quite possibly! UTP is more mature and more widely deployed for now,
though. Another experimental thing to look at is MinimaLT
(http://cr.yp.to/tcpip/minimalt-20130522.pdf).
In any case, this ticket isn't about picking the best possible channel
backend protocol -- it's about (first) getting Steven's initial branch
that he wrote last year good enough to test, and keeping track of what
more would need to be done to merge it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9166#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list