[tor-bugs] #9166 [Tor]: Write a UTP-based channel implementation
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Wed Jul 17 07:48:56 UTC 2013
#9166: Write a UTP-based channel implementation
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: unspecified
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: tor-relay utp | Parent: #9165
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by karsten):
Replying to [comment:8 sjmurdoch]:
> That looks fine to me Karsten (assuming you are using the LLVM hoist
globals version of Shadow; prior ones probably won't work due to the issue
described at https://github.com/bittorrent/libutp/issues/51).
I'm using Shadow master (91fc269). How do I know it worked correctly?
Are there log messages indicating UDP vs. TCP traffic?
> Is 2.5 hours larger than it would be for a network of the same size
without libutp? If so it would be worth investigating this as it probably
would indicate a deeper problem.
2.5 hours is normal. I ran another simulation using vanilla
0.2.4.4-alpha, and that took as long as the other two simulations. See
results
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/9166/sjm217
-utp-combined.2.pdf attached].
So, I wonder, shouldn't the black and blue line overlap more? Is there
anything else I should change in your branch to turn off uTP?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9166#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list