[tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Feb 11 21:28:58 UTC 2013
#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component: Tor | Version: Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
Keywords: tor-auth | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:8 nickm]:
> If we compare node->last_reachable after node->is_running, we should
pretty much just ignore all the other fields (advertised bw, identity),
since we'll almost never get a tie on last_reachable.
I think that would be extra bad, because it would make each dir auth
inconsistent about which sybils it picks, and worse, each dir auth would
be differently inconsistent. We want something where the globally emergent
behavior is consistent.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list