[tor-bugs] #8163 [Tor]: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit

Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki blackhole at torproject.org
Mon Feb 11 21:28:58 UTC 2013


#8163: It is no longer deterministic which Sybils we omit
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma      |          Owner:                     
     Type:  defect    |         Status:  new                
 Priority:  normal    |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final 
Component:  Tor       |        Version:  Tor: 0.2.4.10-alpha
 Keywords:  tor-auth  |         Parent:                     
   Points:            |   Actualpoints:                     
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by arma):

 Replying to [comment:8 nickm]:
 > If we compare node->last_reachable after node->is_running, we should
 pretty much just ignore all the other fields (advertised bw, identity),
 since we'll almost never get a tie on last_reachable.

 I think that would be extra bad, because it would make each dir auth
 inconsistent about which sybils it picks, and worse, each dir auth would
 be differently inconsistent. We want something where the globally emergent
 behavior is consistent.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8163#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online


More information about the tor-bugs mailing list