[tor-bugs] #9204 [Tor Check]: Modularize check.torproject.org
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Tue Aug 13 18:37:48 UTC 2013
#9204: Modularize check.torproject.org
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: project | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Tor Check | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by tup):
* cc: dkantola@… (added)
Comment:
Replying to [comment:6 Sebastian]:
> The separation of tasks is actually one of the driving fotces behind
Torbel. It was designed to be modular from the start
tordnsel was always modular internally, so splitting up tasks that it can
already do into separate programs/processes should be easy.
Replying to [comment:8 nickm]:
> I don't like the notion of using uploaded-from IP to learn a router's
outgoing IP; it's too fragile, and it's completely simple to spoof.
Instead, it should look at the address that connections come from when you
build a circuit through that node to yourself.
I should add that detecting all the outgoing IPs from multi-homed routers
was a design goal in tordnsel. If it doesn't work, that's a bug. I don't
know if this is still a problem, but there's no simple way that I can
think of for tor to solve it while still allowing the routers on the
network (binding the outgoing socket to one IP can be defeated by a packet
filter, middlebox, host OS, etc.).
Is there any interest in someone (me) adapting the old tordnsel code for
this ticket and updating it for the current tor? Is tordnsel fundamentally
broken in design or implementation, or is it just abandoned and nobody
wants to maintain it?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9204#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list