[tor-bugs] #1854 [Analysis]: Investigate raising the minimum bandwidth for getting the Fast flag
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
torproject-admin at torproject.org
Tue Oct 23 13:38:39 UTC 2012
#1854: Investigate raising the minimum bandwidth for getting the Fast flag
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: arma
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Analysis | Version:
Keywords: performance loadbalancing | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by gsathya):
* status: needs_revision => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:31 karsten]:
> Replying to [comment:30 gsathya]:
> > "The probability in the modified consensus is 0 if the relay was
excluded," and "including those that we excluded, because they have non-
zero probability in the modified consensus" seem to be contradicting?
>
> What I meant is "including those that we excluded, because they have
non-zero probability in the '''pristine''' consensus". Sorry.
>
> > > Sathya, want to look into modifying pyentropy.py for the linf stuff?
> >
> > I'm ignoring the probabilities of relays that we excluded because they
have 0 probability. Please check my [https://github.com/gsathya/metrics-
tasks/tree/bug_1854_v2 bug_1854_v2] branch Thanks!
>
> Can you change the above? I just had a quick look, but I'd want to look
closer once it's doing the thing that I think arma et al. had in mind.
Done
> And can you either remove pyentropy.py, or move your changes to
pyentropy.py and remove pylinf.py, so that there's only the code file that
we're actually using in the repository?
Done
Please check my [https://github.com/gsathya/metrics-
tasks/compare/bug_1854_v2 bug_1854_v2] branch. Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1854#comment:32>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list