[tbb-bugs] #30767 [Applications/Tor Browser]: Custom obfs4 bridge does not work on Tor Browser for Android
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Thu Nov 21 18:52:15 UTC 2019
#30767: Custom obfs4 bridge does not work on Tor Browser for Android
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: gk | Owner: tbb-
| team
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: High | Milestone:
Component: Applications/Tor Browser | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tbb-parity, tbb-mobile, | Actual Points:
TorBrowserTeam201911 |
Parent ID: #31284 | Points: 0.5
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
| Sponsor30-can
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by sysrqb):
* status: needs_review => needs_revision
* keywords: tbb-parity, tbb-mobile, TorBrowserTeam201911R => tbb-parity,
tbb-mobile, TorBrowserTeam201911
Comment:
Looks pretty good.
{{{
+ @SettingsConfig
+ public TorConfigBuilder bridgesFromSettings() {
+ List<String> supportedBridges =
settings.getListOfSupportedBridges();
+ if (supportedBridges == null || supportedBridges.isEmpty()) {
+ return this;
+ }
+ String type = supportedBridges.contains("meek") ? "meek_lite" :
"obfs4";
}}}
Do we still use both? obfs4 now has support for meek, so I assume we
simply can do the same. As an example, I have this in my Tor Browser
torrc:
{{{
ClientTransportPlugin meek_lite,obfs2,obfs3,obfs4,scramblesuit exec
./TorBrowser/Tor/PluggableTransports/obfs4proxy
}}}
------------
{{{
- if(hasAddedBridge) useBridges();
}}}
I don't see any other `useBridges()` calls, do we need an unconditional
call now?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30767#comment:17>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tbb-bugs
mailing list