[metrics-team] [roadmap process] follow up with other teams

[Karsten Loesing]

On 2017-11-13 01:31, teor wrote:
> 
>> On 13 Nov 2017, at 10:54, isabela <isabela at torproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Metrics team!

Hi Isabela and teor,

>> This Friday Nov 17 is the when the 'chatting' time ends and we start
>> with execution.
>>
>> This is just symbolic, of course you will not stop talking with other
>> people! But hopefully by this Friday you and the teams who wrote
>> questions related to the Metrics team roadmap, has either addressed them
>> and all is good, or made a plan on how to stay in touch as you work on
>> stuff.

Yes, we went through the questions raised at the inter-team meeting and
updated our roadmap wherever necessary. The plan is to publish this
week. Maybe we'll just wait until Friday, just in case something else
comes up before then.

>> I am sending a similar note to all teams.
>>
>> I also would like to call your attention to Services and UX Team
>> roadmaps that were added to the pad:
>> https://storm.torproject.org/shared/m-IG6BIam2M9tF6rLDKFpBtIaUoTABiXLN17N97-UBf
>>
>>
>> If you have questions for them, there is an section for them at the
>> questions pad:
>> https://storm.torproject.org/shared/6_vKbNygWaF8WcG6xz3lTW6RWbJzlBdm8ZezRYWeuWQ
>>
>>
>> Finally, below are the questions other teams wrote to Metrics team,
>> please take a look at them and follow up with whatever is necessary:
>>
>> Questions/Comments for Metrics team roadmap:
>> https://storm.torproject.org/shared/m-QJrsoQY23x9mv2SSfMPFjx2pbP91wsWpQtjyWoyci
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> [Network] Privcount is on the way; how will it affect you? Will it let
>> us _stop_ collecting any statistics in the current way?
>> [KL: We should probably start getting data from PrivCount before
>> removing those statistics from tor, but yes, once we're there it will
>> let us stop collecting statistics in the current way.]
>> {NM: Is your team available to help pick out the privcount stats?}
>> [KL: Yes, please ping us.]
> 
> I updated this on the pad with some examples, we should work with network
> and NRL to order them.

This is still on our roadmap, so as far as the inter-team coordination
is concerned, I'd say we have this covered.

teor, please ping us whenever you need any input.

>> ...
>>
>> [Network] Re "ipv6 graphs" -- will this be fraction of relays using
>> IPv6? Advertising it, or actually working?
>> [KL: Unclear, I haven't started looking into making these graphs yet,
>> but if you have a preference, be sure to let us know.]
>> {NM: Preference would be fraction with working IPv6. Though both would
>> be even better.}
> 
> I updated this based on Karsten's work in #23761, and my proposed patch.

Yes, we already made a lot of progress on #23761. Now we need to write
some code. But we do have a roadmap item to remind us.

> Hopefully we all look at the pad again and can work out what the new stuff is?

If you want us to look at something, please ping us!

All the best,
Karsten

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/attachments/20171113/2ec9b34e/attachment.sig>